Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy
Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy This last book by the late John Rawls, derived from written lectures and notes for his long-running course on modern political philosophy, offers readers an account of the liberal political tradition from a scholar viewed by many as the greatest contemporary exponent of …
Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy
This last book by the late John Rawls, derived from written lectures and notes for his long-running course on modern political philosophy, offers readers an account of the liberal political tradition from a scholar viewed by many as the greatest contemporary exponent of the philosophy behind that tradition. Rawls’s goal in the lectures was, he wrote, “to identify the more central features of liberalism as expressing a political conception of justice when liberalism is viewed from within th
List Price: $ 23.00
Price: $ 15.30
Related Posts
-
Salazar: A Political Biography
-
Amiri Baraka (African American Poet, Playwright, Novelist and Political Activist)
-
The Selected Political Writings of John Locke (Norton Critical Editions)
-
English Bob’s Presidential Philosophy Pin
-
The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism
-
Tom Paine: A Political Life (Grove Great Lives)
Here is Rawls’ context according to Rawls,
As the editor of this volume notes, “One great benefit of these lectures is that they reveal how Rawls conceived of the history of the social contract tradition, and suggest how he saw his own work in relation to that of Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, and to some degree Hobbes as well” (pg. x). Rawls was reluctant to publish these lectures: “It was only after he was prevailed upon to publish his ‘Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy‘…that he agreed to allow his lectures on the history of political philosophy to be published as well” (pg. xv).
Rawls says his goal in these lectures is to “try to identify the more central features of liberalism as expressing a political conception of justice when liberalism is viewed from within the tradition of democratic constitutionalism. One strand in this tradition, the doctrine of the social contract, is represented by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau; another strand, that of utilitarianism, is represented by Hume and J.S. Mill; whereas the socialist, or social democratic strand, is represented by Marx, whom I consider largely as a critic of liberalism” (pg. xvii). Rawls goes on to admit that his approach “do[es] not present a balanced introduction to the political and social philosophy” (pg. xviii).
The “Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy” are, more specifically, a history of modern contractual political philosophy. These lectures will provide added clarity to the tensions between his book A Theory of Justice and his Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. For example, Michael Sandel’s, whose appraisal of Rawls works mostly off of “A Theory of Justice” alone, wrote in his book Liberalism and the Limits of Justice that Rawls offers “deontology with a Humean face” which entails, according to Sandel, that Rawls doctrine “justice is the first virtue of social institutions” a teleology based an a metaphysical notion of the self which is the exact thing Rawls wanted to avoid; Sandel says, “teleology to the contrary, what is most essential to our personhood is not the ends we choose but our capacity to choose them. And this capacity is located in a self which must be prior to the ends it chooses.” Thus Sandel takes offense against Rawls’ Kantian style distinctions like “original position,” behind a “veil of ignorance.”
However, with “Justice as Fairness” and other writings (e.g. Kantian Constructivism) Rawls became more clear that there is no noncircular argument for democratic ideas; he says in “Justice as Fairness: A Restatement,” that, “since justice as fairness is intended as a political conception of justice as a democratic society, it tries to draw solely upon basic intuitive ideas that are embedded in the political institutions of a democratic society and the public traditions of their interpretation.”
Rawls shows in these lectures on the history of philosophy how his philosophy is sufficiently historical and contingent to avoid much overworked metaphysics: “the same effect as that of a veil of ignorance may result from a combination of other elements. Thus, rather than exclude information, we can allow people to know whatever they now know and yet make the contract binding in perpetuity and suppose the parties to care about their descendants, indefinitely into the distant future. In protecting their descendent’s as well as themselves, they face a situation of great uncertainty. Thus, roughly the same arguments, somewhat modified, pertain as with a thick veil of ignorance” (pg. 19; see also footnote 7 pg, 269).
These lectures, however, are not so much about Rawls’ theory of justice. Rawls writes charitably about others throughout, when he does criticize it is insightful. These lecture notes are surprisingly detailed at times, with footnotes and full citations. A benefit for researchers will be the generous index at the book’s end.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Useful,
This very good book is a well edited transcript of Rawls’ lecture notes from his political philosophy course. The heart of the book is a series of lectures on major contributors to social contract theory – Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. These are clear, insightful, and sympathetic discussions of these thinkers with Rawls emphasizing the role of each philosopher’s response to his contemporary problems in formulating their ideas. Rawls discusses as well some other thinkers not part of this tradition, Hume and JS Mill for utilitarianism, and Marx as representing a view completely outside the liberal tradition. Not surprisingly, aspects of each writer that Rawls found particularly interesting and important in formuation of his own distinguished contribution to the social contract tradition emerge from these discussions. This is particularly clear of his sympathetic discussions of Rousseau and particularly JS Mill. In Rawls presentation, Mill, not strictly a member of the social contract tradition, provides a progenitor of Rawls concept of public reason in the formulation of social institutions. As a plus, there are also transcripts of lectures on the important but lesser known Henry Sidgwick and Joseph Butler.
In his primary work, Rawls is not always easy to read. These lectures, however, are generally lucid.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Great,
This is an excellent set of lectures that give a fresh and
fascinating insight into the ideas of various political
philosophers. But what’s important here is that the context for
Rawls’s own ideas become more apparent, and this heritage from
these thinkers makes the enterprise of his own work appear deeper and
more meaningful. Don’t miss this one.
Was this review helpful to you?
|